back
work · 2026 IPM malaria (BMGF) methodology

a geospatial seasonality upgrade for malaria models

Peak transmission month across sub-Saharan Africa, shown at four modeling resolutions: country rainfall, admin1 rainfall, water-balance, and species kernel
Peak transmission month, sharpening from one national curve to an admin1-resolution emergence surface — open the full flyover →

The portfolio’s malaria models inherited seasonality from country-level rainfall: one transmission curve per country, applied uniformly to every district inside it. This work rebuilt seasonality as an admin1-resolution, mechanism-aware surface — water-balance and species-kernel emergence models, calibrated against observed transmission and handed off cleanly to OpenMalaria.

18
countries
362
admin1 units
4
resolutions compared
12
monthly surfaces

Context

Seasonality drives when interventions land and how transmission rebounds. The legacy portfolio used a single national rainfall curve per country, which flattens real within-country variation — a district in the arid north and one on a humid lakeshore got the same transmission calendar. For a portfolio deciding when and where to deploy seasonal products, that resolution wasn’t good enough.

What this is

The upgrade moves seasonality through four representations, from the legacy national curve to a mechanism-based admin1 surface:

Monthly vector emergence surfaces for January, April, July, and October under the species-kernel model
Monthly emergence under the species-kernel model — the seasonal signal each district actually receives.

What I owned

What it changes

One national curve per country became 362 admin1 emergence profiles, handed to OpenMalaria without touching the simulator. The public flyover shows where peak transmission month moves under each representation, and how each compares against observed transmission timing.

See it

The full flyover is public: read the seasonality flyover →

all work